<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mapping four-fold conceptual schemes onto Grid-Group Cultural Theory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fourcultures.com/2009/06/03/mapping-four-fold-conceptual-schemes-onto-grid-group-cultural-theory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fourcultures.com/2009/06/03/mapping-four-fold-conceptual-schemes-onto-grid-group-cultural-theory/</link>
	<description>Cultural Theory and Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 21:17:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Öberg</title>
		<link>http://fourcultures.com/2009/06/03/mapping-four-fold-conceptual-schemes-onto-grid-group-cultural-theory/#comment-3001</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robin Öberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 21:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fourcultures.com/?p=697#comment-3001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[haha, so, what&#039;s the anwer? What makes some overlaying maps ok while others seem absurd?

It&#039;s an honest question, seeing as I&#039;m probably doing the same right now. Equating vertical social control with Grid, and horisontal social control with Group.

What criteria should we follow to determine if it&#039;s ok to overlay two fourfold models? Obviously, they should match in ideology somehow. Had I reversed it, and said that horisontal social control is like Grid, then it would have made no sense.

As for Heidegger&#039;s model, if it works as a twofold model, there&#039;s no point in making it into a fourfold model. Ockham&#039;s Razor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha, so, what&#8217;s the anwer? What makes some overlaying maps ok while others seem absurd?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an honest question, seeing as I&#8217;m probably doing the same right now. Equating vertical social control with Grid, and horisontal social control with Group.</p>
<p>What criteria should we follow to determine if it&#8217;s ok to overlay two fourfold models? Obviously, they should match in ideology somehow. Had I reversed it, and said that horisontal social control is like Grid, then it would have made no sense.</p>
<p>As for Heidegger&#8217;s model, if it works as a twofold model, there&#8217;s no point in making it into a fourfold model. Ockham&#8217;s Razor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I&#8217;ll have four of everything &#171; Fourcultures</title>
		<link>http://fourcultures.com/2009/06/03/mapping-four-fold-conceptual-schemes-onto-grid-group-cultural-theory/#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll have four of everything &#171; Fourcultures]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fourcultures.com/?p=697#comment-481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I&#8217;ll have four of&#160;everything By fourcultures  So many four-fold conceptual schemes, so little time&#8230; The following three appear arbitary, contrived, as though arranging a subject matter in groups of four was in itself clever (and just to complete my own set of four, here&#8217;s one I wrote about earlier). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ll have four of&nbsp;everything By fourcultures  So many four-fold conceptual schemes, so little time&#8230; The following three appear arbitary, contrived, as though arranging a subject matter in groups of four was in itself clever (and just to complete my own set of four, here&#8217;s one I wrote about earlier). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

