<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Psychology fails to explain the Global Financial Crisis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fourcultures.com/2009/09/27/why-psychology-fails-to-explain-the-global-financial-crisis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fourcultures.com/2009/09/27/why-psychology-fails-to-explain-the-global-financial-crisis/</link>
	<description>Cultural Theory and Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 21:17:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fourcultures</title>
		<link>http://fourcultures.com/2009/09/27/why-psychology-fails-to-explain-the-global-financial-crisis/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fourcultures]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fourcultures.com/?p=821#comment-641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you Dave, I&#039;d love to know what the actuaries thought of this presentation! It seems like there could be a worthwhile fit. And I also must ask what you yourself think of the critique of psychological explanations, as above. I note the presentation you link to sees each of the four cultural biases almost as &#039;personality types&#039;, or as four ideal type actuaries with typical views and typical statements. I think this works for introducing Cultural Theory, but isn&#039;t there a danger, as I said in my original post, that this is an Individualist retelling of Cultural Theory, in which the individual is the measure? Surely its our&lt;em&gt; institutions&lt;/em&gt;, our&lt;em&gt; cultures&lt;/em&gt;, that try to make us Individualists (or Egalitarians, Fatalists, Hierarchists)  and we have to live with them somehow as humans? I guess I&#039;m arguing, at least party inspired by Mary Douglas, that our personalities aren&#039;t merely our own, embedded in our brains, but arise out of their context. Anyway, thanks so much for the link.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Dave, I&#8217;d love to know what the actuaries thought of this presentation! It seems like there could be a worthwhile fit. And I also must ask what you yourself think of the critique of psychological explanations, as above. I note the presentation you link to sees each of the four cultural biases almost as &#8216;personality types&#8217;, or as four ideal type actuaries with typical views and typical statements. I think this works for introducing Cultural Theory, but isn&#8217;t there a danger, as I said in my original post, that this is an Individualist retelling of Cultural Theory, in which the individual is the measure? Surely its our<em> institutions</em>, our<em> cultures</em>, that try to make us Individualists (or Egalitarians, Fatalists, Hierarchists)  and we have to live with them somehow as humans? I guess I&#8217;m arguing, at least party inspired by Mary Douglas, that our personalities aren&#8217;t merely our own, embedded in our brains, but arise out of their context. Anyway, thanks so much for the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: riskviews</title>
		<link>http://fourcultures.com/2009/09/27/why-psychology-fails-to-explain-the-global-financial-crisis/#comment-638</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[riskviews]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fourcultures.com/?p=821#comment-638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is an attempt to start to explain the crisis in Cultural Theory terms.  
http://www.soa.org/files/pdf/2009-chicago-erm-ingram-02.pdf
Or an audio of the same material
http://www.soa.org/files/audio/2009-chicago-erm-ingram-lunch.mp3]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is an attempt to start to explain the crisis in Cultural Theory terms.<br />
<a href="http://www.soa.org/files/pdf/2009-chicago-erm-ingram-02.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.soa.org/files/pdf/2009-chicago-erm-ingram-02.pdf</a><br />
Or an audio of the same material<br />
<a href="http://www.soa.org/files/audio/2009-chicago-erm-ingram-lunch.mp3" rel="nofollow">http://www.soa.org/files/audio/2009-chicago-erm-ingram-lunch.mp3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

