<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are the guardians of national boundaries beginning to look pathetic?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fourcultures.com/2010/02/03/are-the-guardians-of-national-boundaries-beginning-to-lok-pathetic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fourcultures.com/2010/02/03/are-the-guardians-of-national-boundaries-beginning-to-lok-pathetic/</link>
	<description>Cultural Theory and Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 03:58:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Google Dilemma Part 3 &#171; Fourcultures</title>
		<link>http://fourcultures.com/2010/02/03/are-the-guardians-of-national-boundaries-beginning-to-lok-pathetic/#comment-783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Google Dilemma Part 3 &#171; Fourcultures]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fourcultures.com/?p=1018#comment-783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] excursus: are the guardians of national boundaries beginning to look pathetic? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] excursus: are the guardians of national boundaries beginning to look pathetic? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fourcultures</title>
		<link>http://fourcultures.com/2010/02/03/are-the-guardians-of-national-boundaries-beginning-to-lok-pathetic/#comment-756</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fourcultures]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fourcultures.com/?p=1018#comment-756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree. I remember visiting Hong Kong and then the special economic zone of Shenzen in the late 1980s. People had interesting and very different ideas of what constituted China and being Chinese.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I remember visiting Hong Kong and then the special economic zone of Shenzen in the late 1980s. People had interesting and very different ideas of what constituted China and being Chinese.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theothergardener</title>
		<link>http://fourcultures.com/2010/02/03/are-the-guardians-of-national-boundaries-beginning-to-lok-pathetic/#comment-755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theothergardener]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 03:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fourcultures.com/?p=1018#comment-755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really the fact that &quot;nations have proliferated&quot; is more proof that the nation-state, such as it is, continues to break down.  Many of the &quot;new&quot; nations, such as in the Baltic region, are actually pieces of former nations, and are based on ethnicity and some other far older categories, which does not so much suggest a regression to me as it does a fragmentation of the nation-state under pressure from economic forces.  This is the emergence of &quot;zones&quot; which I&#039;ve written about elsewhere.  I am not convinced that the nation-state will break down entirely, so much as that these new definitions will become more important in people&#039;s lives.  If you live in one of the &quot;economic development zones&quot; that cross boundaries and dot Southeast Asia and Latin America, then does it really matter to you whether you live in one country or another, or does the fact that you live in an EDZ not define you more?  
TOG]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really the fact that &#8220;nations have proliferated&#8221; is more proof that the nation-state, such as it is, continues to break down.  Many of the &#8220;new&#8221; nations, such as in the Baltic region, are actually pieces of former nations, and are based on ethnicity and some other far older categories, which does not so much suggest a regression to me as it does a fragmentation of the nation-state under pressure from economic forces.  This is the emergence of &#8220;zones&#8221; which I&#8217;ve written about elsewhere.  I am not convinced that the nation-state will break down entirely, so much as that these new definitions will become more important in people&#8217;s lives.  If you live in one of the &#8220;economic development zones&#8221; that cross boundaries and dot Southeast Asia and Latin America, then does it really matter to you whether you live in one country or another, or does the fact that you live in an EDZ not define you more?<br />
TOG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

