<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Fourcultures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fourcultures.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fourcultures.com</link>
	<description>Cultural Theory and Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 03:58:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Everything’s Intentional by dmk38</title>
		<link>http://fourcultures.com/2012/02/06/everythings-intentional/#comment-2717</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dmk38]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 03:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fourcultures.com/?p=1618#comment-2717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[too easy: the word is &quot;intentional.&quot;
:)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>too easy: the word is &#8220;intentional.&#8221; <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A two-bit theory of social reality by dmk38</title>
		<link>http://fourcultures.com/2012/02/03/a-two-bit-theory-of-social-reality/#comment-2712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dmk38]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fourcultures.com/?p=1603#comment-2712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[oh... okay. I just really like entanglement! 
thx!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh&#8230; okay. I just really like entanglement!<br />
thx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A two-bit theory of social reality by fourcultures</title>
		<link>http://fourcultures.com/2012/02/03/a-two-bit-theory-of-social-reality/#comment-2706</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fourcultures]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 10:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fourcultures.com/?p=1603#comment-2706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there a quantum translation of my 2 bits heuristic? Yes and no... Actually I&#039;m not going there. If I did we&#039;d end up with our own little version of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair&quot; title=&quot;wikipedia&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sokal Affair&lt;/a&gt;. I&#039;m not sure what a discussion of qubits would add here, although it would provide several illustrations of systems that operate beyond simply &#039;either/or&#039;, &#039;on/off&#039;,&#039;up/down&#039;. The key point is this: &quot;as experience in Computer Science has shown, working at the right level of abstraction is essential if large and complex systems are to be described and reasoned about in a managable fashion&quot; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.5342v1&quot; title=&quot;Logic and categories as tools for building theories&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Abramsky&lt;/a&gt; 2012:16). I&#039;m not yet convinced that quantum computing and human social behaviour share relevant levels of abstraction. I&#039;m just exploring... On the other hand I think it&#039;s relevant to use the binary metaphor because we appear to use this all the time in social contexts. Three alternative routes forward since I&#039;m not entirely comfortable with quantum computing: One line of enquiry might be in the direction of game theory, which abstracts, typically, to two players faced with a couple of alternative choices each (e.g. loyalty or defection, stag or hare). Another might be in the direction of information theory as metaphor. Information (for computer science) means something quite different from information (for ordinary human communication). Conflating these two meanings seems problematic, not least because it tends to anthropomorphise machinery and machinify human brains. A third way forward might be to investigate the Jain concept of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sy%C4%81dv%C4%81da&quot; title=&quot;Wikipedia&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Syādvāda&lt;/a&gt;, a sophisticated (but non-scientific) understanding of conditioned predication. The equivalent to the &#039;quantum&#039; state might be &lt;em&gt;syād-asti-nāsti-avaktavyaḥ&lt;/em&gt; - &#039;in some ways it is, it is not and it is indescribable&#039;. But Jain logic has seven predications, &lt;em&gt;saptabhanginaya&lt;/em&gt;, not two or four.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a quantum translation of my 2 bits heuristic? Yes and no&#8230; Actually I&#8217;m not going there. If I did we&#8217;d end up with our own little version of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair" title="wikipedia" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Sokal Affair</a>. I&#8217;m not sure what a discussion of qubits would add here, although it would provide several illustrations of systems that operate beyond simply &#8216;either/or&#8217;, &#8216;on/off&#8217;,'up/down&#8217;. The key point is this: &#8220;as experience in Computer Science has shown, working at the right level of abstraction is essential if large and complex systems are to be described and reasoned about in a managable fashion&#8221; (<a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.5342v1" title="Logic and categories as tools for building theories" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Abramsky</a> 2012:16). I&#8217;m not yet convinced that quantum computing and human social behaviour share relevant levels of abstraction. I&#8217;m just exploring&#8230; On the other hand I think it&#8217;s relevant to use the binary metaphor because we appear to use this all the time in social contexts. Three alternative routes forward since I&#8217;m not entirely comfortable with quantum computing: One line of enquiry might be in the direction of game theory, which abstracts, typically, to two players faced with a couple of alternative choices each (e.g. loyalty or defection, stag or hare). Another might be in the direction of information theory as metaphor. Information (for computer science) means something quite different from information (for ordinary human communication). Conflating these two meanings seems problematic, not least because it tends to anthropomorphise machinery and machinify human brains. A third way forward might be to investigate the Jain concept of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sy%C4%81dv%C4%81da" title="Wikipedia" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Syādvāda</a>, a sophisticated (but non-scientific) understanding of conditioned predication. The equivalent to the &#8216;quantum&#8217; state might be <em>syād-asti-nāsti-avaktavyaḥ</em> &#8211; &#8216;in some ways it is, it is not and it is indescribable&#8217;. But Jain logic has seven predications, <em>saptabhanginaya</em>, not two or four.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New uses for classic theories &#8211; Mary Douglas in 2010 by Drum and bass</title>
		<link>http://fourcultures.com/2010/02/23/new-uses-for-classic-theories-mary-douglas-in-2010/#comment-2703</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drum and bass]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fourcultures.com/?p=1061#comment-2703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suggest adding a &quot;google+&quot; button for the blog! Hellen]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest adding a &#8220;google+&#8221; button for the blog! Hellen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A two-bit theory of social reality by dmk38</title>
		<link>http://fourcultures.com/2012/02/03/a-two-bit-theory-of-social-reality/#comment-2699</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dmk38]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fourcultures.com/?p=1603#comment-2699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this seems very right!

Now, &quot;yes &amp; no&quot; -- that is what quantum bits (qubits) are for, correct?

Is there a &quot;quantum&quot; translation of your 2 bits heuristic? Maybe you&#039;ll say no. But if yes, can you tell us what it would be like to use it? Maybe illustrate?

:)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this seems very right!</p>
<p>Now, &#8220;yes &amp; no&#8221; &#8212; that is what quantum bits (qubits) are for, correct?</p>
<p>Is there a &#8220;quantum&#8221; translation of your 2 bits heuristic? Maybe you&#8217;ll say no. But if yes, can you tell us what it would be like to use it? Maybe illustrate?<br />
 <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A two-bit theory of social reality by ooa revo</title>
		<link>http://fourcultures.com/2012/02/03/a-two-bit-theory-of-social-reality/#comment-2697</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ooa revo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fourcultures.com/?p=1603#comment-2697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://reblogmachine.wordpress.com/2012/02/02/78/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Reblog Machine&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://reblogmachine.wordpress.com/2012/02/02/78/" rel="nofollow">Reblog Machine</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The meaning of culture by Charla</title>
		<link>http://fourcultures.com/2009/11/05/the-meaning-of-culture/#comment-2670</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fourcultures.com/?p=840#comment-2670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I appeirctae you taking to time to contribute That&#039;s very helpful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appeirctae you taking to time to contribute That&#8217;s very helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Experts and Cultural Cognition by fourcultures</title>
		<link>http://fourcultures.com/2011/12/20/experts-and-cultural-cognition/#comment-2642</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fourcultures]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fourcultures.com/?p=1534#comment-2642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks! Lots of writing, not much time to actually post. Expect more in the next couple of weeks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! Lots of writing, not much time to actually post. Expect more in the next couple of weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Experts and Cultural Cognition by dmk38</title>
		<link>http://fourcultures.com/2011/12/20/experts-and-cultural-cognition/#comment-2635</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dmk38]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fourcultures.com/?p=1534#comment-2635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[please post something!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please post something!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Experts and Cultural Cognition by dmk38</title>
		<link>http://fourcultures.com/2011/12/20/experts-and-cultural-cognition/#comment-2591</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dmk38]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fourcultures.com/?p=1534#comment-2591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are of course correct! I acknowledge this -- but offer a qualification with which you might or might not agree -- at http://www.culturalcognition.net/blog/2011/12/17/do-experts-use-cultural-cognition.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are of course correct! I acknowledge this &#8212; but offer a qualification with which you might or might not agree &#8212; at <a href="http://www.culturalcognition.net/blog/2011/12/17/do-experts-use-cultural-cognition.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.culturalcognition.net/blog/2011/12/17/do-experts-use-cultural-cognition.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

