The hypothesis of cricket blogger downatthirdman is that as the culture of the English downlands shifted from strong grid – strong group Hierarchy towards a weaker grid- weaker group Individualism in the Eighteenth century, so the game of cricket became an ideal carrier of the new values.
Cricket’s mix of team work, rule formalism and recognition of individual prowess (earned status as opposed to ascribed status) was exactly suited for the times. It’s certainly an interesting idea.
“As the requirements of the social structure changed so the culture responded in the type of rituals (including games) needed to reinforce the system. Cricket with its mixture of team work and individualism exactly met the need. Its time had come.”
You can read more at Chalk and cheese: towards a cultural theory of cricket.
And there’s a second instalment here, with some great pictures: The cradle of cricket was an old fashioned car boot sale.
Given the recent match fixing scandal that has engulfed international cricket in recent weeks I can’t help wondering whether a similar analysis could be made of the current situation. One way of looking at corruption in professional sport might be to see it as an over-emphasis on competitive Individualism, in which rule-following is a hindrance to financial success and the winners are the ones who get away with it.
- Cricket and corruption: a sport that needs fixing | Editorial (guardian.co.uk)
- Imran Khan on corruption in cricket (bbc.co.uk)
- ‘Cricket’s biggest chance to clean itself’ – Rahul Dravid (cricinfo.com)
- Sorry affair steals a little more light from Pakistanis’ lives (theage.com.au)